On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 07:35:48PM +0000, tim hall wrote: > Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> Its in no way important, not even near to it. Its priority extra, so >> lowest possible priority. > > Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application, which > many people use and would expect to find in Debian. Therefore it is worth > making the extra effort to keep it well maintained IMO. The point being > that debian-multimedia should deal with it if group maintenance is needed > rather than QA.
I don't know the package myself, but if this is true, it seems that the package should be priority optional, not extra. Extra is for packages which you only want if you have special needs. (There are also no conflicts.) Whoever is going to improve and/or take over this package might want to consider changing this. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
