|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes: JU> Anyway, there's going to be a 'rosegarden' and probably a JU> compatibility 'rosegarden4' symlink. JU> We can make rosegarden4 or rosegarden a dummy package, and JU> use either one.
JU> rosegarden2 can be removed. It is a very different beast, and there JU> might be users, but really, I don't think it's too good an idea to JU> keep something that is only of an archaeological interest. Yes, I agree. A the upstream source name is "rosegarden", for sake of semplicity I'd set "rosegarden" as the new package name for the bleeding-edge upstream, and turn "rosegarden4" into a pointer to "rosegarden". Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
