Hi guenter! On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, guenter geiger wrote:
> > Someone should just _package_ that module! > > Before packaging Herbert Xu should be connected, because if he doesn't > change the configuration of the debian kernel the module can not be > loaded. But only "should". There are kernel-patch packages that don't work with the Debian kernel. There is no reason why there can't be lsm-realtime-source which does not compile for the Debian default kernel. Plus: There is kernel-patch-2.4-lsm. And last time i checked 2.4 was still the default kernel. So we can build on (manybe recommend) kernel-patch-2.4-lsm. > Then, this would need to be someone who has a bit of insight into > linux security modules, in order to explain him why he should change it, > and to make sure that it actually doesn't harm security. He favours including LSM. <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200312/msg01713.html> > Unfortunately I do not have this insight (yet?). Me neither. Robert. --
