>>>>> "joq" == Jack O'Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
joq> Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Is somebody
joq> already packaging Jack's and Torben's kernel module >> for
joq> the 2.6?
joq> Not that I know of. So far, it's just been experimentally
joq> hosted on my home system, `www.joq.us'. There has been
joq> enough interest in the LAD community that I had already
joq> decided to create a SourceForge project for it.
joq> It is a small piece of code. As Guenter pointed out, the
joq> biggest problem is the Makefile. I've made some changes to
joq> Torben's original version, but it still heavily depends on
joq> the kernel build process. Making it work with make-kpkg or
joq> building it as a separate package will not be a trivial job.
I'm not sure to fully understand what the problem is.. anyhow I gave a
glance at the Makefile in realtime-0.0.3.tar.gz, but it seems to me
that just having the usual /usr/src/linux tree would suffices, and I
think this is a usual requirement for most debian kernel modules
packages..
joq> I am glad to help in any way I can. But, I am not a DD,
joq> don't know much about building `.deb's, and am only slightly
joq> familiar with the new 2.6 kernel Makefile structure. So,
joq> some serious Debian skills will be needed to get this LSM
joq> packaged properly.
joq> I will ask on the linux-security-modules mailing list for
joq> other's experience with separate packaging and building.
joq> Surely there are examples we can look at. -- joq
Ok, that's a good starting point.
Free
