Hi,
I admit that I haven't been following jack releases very closely recently.
I tend to check objdump output and decide that binary compatibility broke,
instead of checking every program to see if they are broken or not;
and that usually tells me that things are changed.
I very much appreciate your efforts to keep binary compatibility,
but I just hope it doesn't burden development too much.
I'd rather see liberal development until satisfaction than seeing
a lot of compatibility code already accumulating on jack.
We've declared that jack isn't really going to be binary compatible,
and I find it advantageous to exploit that ability.
I consider rebuilding all packages against new versions of jack has been
one way to ensure that we have working jack packages.
> Thanks for your patience thus far. ;-)
Thanks :)
regards,
junichi
