debian-mips  

Messages by Thread

• Bug#1093862: mame: FTBFS on mips64el: collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’ Simon McVittie
• Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
• Bug#1093752: coot: fix ftbfs on riscv64 and mips64el Bo YU
• Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Matthias Geiger
  • Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Shengjing Zhu
  • Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Fabian Grünbichler
  • Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Uwe Kleine-König
• Source package quantlib-swig now fails on mips64el Dirk Eddelbuettel
• Bug#1091091: src:wings3d: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Paul Gevers
• Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Nelson H. F. Beebe
  • Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Mateusz Jończyk
  • Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Mateusz Jończyk
  • Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Nelson H. F. Beebe
• nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug? Hilko Bengen
  • Re: nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug? Petter Reinholdtsen
  • Re: Bug#1082751: nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug? Hilko Bengen
• Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1087809: cargo: [mipsel64] failed to acquire jobserver token/Bad address (os error 14) Fabian Grünbichler
• Differences between mips64 buildds? Ole Streicher
• Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Simon McVittie
  • Re: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Matthew Vernon
  • Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Matthew Vernon
• Bug#1087281: llvm-defaults: Please provide libomp5 and libomp-dev on riscv64 (and mips64el and loong64) Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1087280: llvm-toolchain-19: Please re-enable OpenMP (without offloading) on riscv64 (and mips64el and loong64) Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
• Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS on -ports architectures: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS with weston 14: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
• Bug#1081275: gtk4: gdk/memorytexture test failing in r16g16b16-float/ngl on mips64el only Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1081275: gtk4: gdk/memorytexture test failing in r16g16b16-float/ngl on mips64el only Simon McVittie
• Bug#1080477: gtk4: FTBFS on mips64el with Mesa 24.2.x: GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe no longer works Simon McVittie
  • Re: gtk4: FTBFS on mips64el with Mesa 24.2.x: GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe no longer works Simon McVittie
• Bug#1080457: LLVM 19 ftbfs with linker error Matthias Klose
• Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
  • Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
  • Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Adrian Bunk
• Re: binutils: gold linker is broken on mips64el when configured with --enable-default-hash-style=gnu Matthias Klose
  • Re: binutils: gold linker is broken on mips64el when configured with --enable-default-hash-style=gnu Ilias Tsitsimpis
  • Re: binutils: gold linker is broken on mips64el when configured with --enable-default-hash-style=gnu Matthias Klose
• Bug#1077178: src:gtk4: Test failures because of image diff on mips64el Matthias Geiger
  • Re: Bug#1077178: src:gtk4: Test failures because of image diff on mips64el Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1077178: gtk4: reftest failure in label-shadows.ui on mips64el and riscv64 mips64el Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1077178: gtk4: reftest failure in label-shadows.ui on mips64el and riscv64 mips64el Simon McVittie
• [d...@fifthhorseman.net: Bug#1076650: rust-sequoia-sop 0.35.0-3 FTBFS on mips64el ("relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_TLS_GD ...")] Aurelien Jarno
• juce FTBFS on mips64el Debian/GNU
  • Re: juce FTBFS on mips64el YunQiang Su
  • Re: juce FTBFS on mips64el Andrius Merkys
• Bug#1070042: libarchive: archive_entry_stat returns zero size on mips64el with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: Bug#1070042: libarchive: archive_entry_stat returns zero size on mips64el with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Bug#1070042: libarchive: archive_entry_stat returns zero size on mips64el with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 Peter Pentchev
  • Re: Bug#1070042: libarchive: archive_entry_stat returns zero size on mips64el with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 Theodore Ts'o
• Fwd: RFC: Remove documentation of IRIX as supported platform Jeffrey Walton
• Bug#1068365: util-linux: FTBFS on mips64el in lsfd/mkfds-multiplexing-pselect6 test et al Chris Hofstaedtler
• Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> (reply to Patrick Franz <delta...@debian.org>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• IP-22 Installation Media germ mipseb
  • Re: IP-22 Installation Media YunQiang Su
  • Re: IP-22 Installation Media Florian Lohoff
• Bug#1067026: graphviz: please build without librsvg except on rust platforms Thorsten Glaser
• Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc Thorsten Glaser
• python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Helge Deller
• Bug#1063796: src:plplot: fails to migrate to testing for too long: patchelf not available on mips64el Paul Gevers
• Bug#1063446: libmozjs-115-dev: cannot call JS::CanonicalizeNaN(double) on mips64el Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1063446: libmozjs-115-dev: cannot call JS::CanonicalizeNaN(double) on mips64el Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1063446: libmozjs-115-dev: cannot call JS::CanonicalizeNaN(double) on mips64el Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1063446: libmozjs-115-dev: cannot call JS::CanonicalizeNaN(double) on mips64el Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
• Bug#1061679: libqt5datavisualization5: Crashes in Q3DBars destructor on mips64el Dmitry Shachnev
• Bug#1061606: openjdk-23 ftbfs on mips64el Matthias Klose
• Re: Bug#1060779: src:mesa: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unavailable Build-Depends on mips64el Simon McVittie
• Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS Sebastiaan Couwenberg
  • Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS Jeffrey Walton
• Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed Simon McVittie
• Re: Bug#1056238: gcc-13: FTBFS on mips64el: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity Matthias Klose
  • Re: Bug#1056238: gcc-13: FTBFS on mips64el: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1056116: llvm-toolchain-17 ftbfs on mips64el Matthias Klose
  • Re: Bug#1056116: llvm-toolchain-17 ftbfs on mips64el Simon McVittie
• Bug#1055021: linux: mips64el loongson3 kernel crashes when running cmake Aurelien Jarno
• texlive-bin: test builds on your architectures Preuße , Hilmar
  • Re: texlive-bin: test builds on your architectures Bo YU
  • Re: texlive-bin: test builds on your architectures Preuße , Hilmar
  • Re: texlive-bin: test builds on your architectures Hilmar Preuße
• Release Team concern about mips64el buildd status Paul Gevers
  • Re: Release Team concern about mips64el buildd status YunQiang Su
• Bug#1050872: release.debian.org: mips64el apparently relies on buster (oldoldstable) LTS? Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1050872: release.debian.org: mips64el apparently relies on buster (oldoldstable) LTS? Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1050872: release.debian.org: mips64el apparently relies on buster (oldoldstable) LTS? Aurelien Jarno
• Re: Bug#1050432: rpy2: FTBFS on mips64el Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1050432: rpy2: FTBFS on mips64el Dirk Eddelbuettel
  • Re: Bug#1050432: rpy2: FTBFS on mips64el YunQiang Su
  • Re: Bug#1050432: rpy2: FTBFS on mips64el Dirk Eddelbuettel
  • Re: Bug#1050432: rpy2: FTBFS on mips64el YunQiang Su
  • Re: Bug#1050432: rpy2: FTBFS on mips64el Dirk Eddelbuettel
• Bug#1050077: gtk4: 4.12 regression: FTBFS on mips(64)el: multiple test failures Simon McVittie
• Bug#1049404: mesa: gnome-shell crashes when using llvmpipe on mips64el Simon McVittie
• Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie Moritz Mühlenhoff
  • Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie Guillem Jover
• Bug#1043114: Please remove mipsel port from testing and sid YunQiang Su
  • Re: Bug#1043114: Please remove mipsel port from testing and sid Ansgar
  • Re: Bug#1043114: Please remove mipsel port from testing and sid Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1043048: openblas: gives wrong results on mips64el, ignores test failures Rebecca N. Palmer
• Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail YunQiang Su
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail YunQiang Su
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail YunQiang Su
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail YunQiang Su
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1042980: gnome-shell: FTBFS on mips64el, mipsel: perf-* tests fail Simon McVittie
• OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Ilias Tsitsimpis
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Ilias Tsitsimpis
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Ilias Tsitsimpis
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Ilias Tsitsimpis
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: OOM while building ghc 9.4.5 Ilias Tsitsimpis
• Getting Bullseye/Bookworm kernel running on Loongson 3A boards Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Getting Bullseye/Bookworm kernel running on Loongson 3A boards Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Getting Bullseye/Bookworm kernel running on Loongson 3A boards Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Getting Bullseye/Bookworm kernel running on Loongson 3A boards Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Getting Bullseye/Bookworm kernel running on Loongson 3A boards Thomas Bogendoerfer
  • Re: Getting Bullseye/Bookworm kernel running on Loongson 3A boards Jiaxun Yang
  • Re: Getting Bullseye/Bookworm kernel running on Loongson 3A boards YunQiang Su
• Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Jeff Layton
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Dave Chinner
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Finn Thain
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Finn Thain
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Theodore Ts'o
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Linus Torvalds
• The future of mipsel port YunQiang Su
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Matthew Garrett
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: The future of mipsel port YunQiang Su
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Paul Wise
  • Re: The future of mipsel port YunQiang Su
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: The future of mipsel port YunQiang Su
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Mark Hymers
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Paul Gevers
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Mark Hymers
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Adrian Bunk
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Adrian Bunk
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Florian Lohoff
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Paul Wise
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Adrian Bunk
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: The future of mipsel port Florian Lohoff
• Bug#1041340: RM: libreoffice [mipsel] -- ROM; broken Rene Engelhard
  • Re: Bug#1041340: RM: libreoffice [mipsel] -- ROM; broken Rene Engelhard
• Bug#1040827: RM: firefox [mipsel] -- RoQA; severely outdated, depends on transitional libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1040827: RM: firefox [mipsel] -- RoQA; severely outdated, depends on transitional libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 Simon McVittie
• Bug#1040663: linux: Please build linux-libc-dev package for loong64 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Re: gcc-13 ftbfs on mipsel Matthias Klose
• Lemote Fuloong 2F Efraim Flashner
  • Re: Lemote Fuloong 2F YunQiang Su
  • Re: Lemote Fuloong 2F Jeffrey Walton
• unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kurt Roeckx
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Steve McIntyre
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Omer Turpault
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk

• Earlier messages