Replying inline: On 31/12/15 12:42, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:00:11PM +0000, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >> So I am searching for >> someone that can help sponsor the packages, close the ITA and help me >> fix the last bits for making the packages fit for Debian. >> >> The packages are very old. I can't update sawfish without updating >> it's build-depends so starting with librep. The latest changes are >> on collab-maint and being tested in two of my PC for since August. > ok, there a bunch of things I'd like to see before uploading this. > > * d/control: > + bump standards-version to the last policy release, 3.9.6 > - this also requires adding stuff to d/rules. maybe just use dh? > + canonicalize Vcs-* (for -Browser please use https)
Canonicalize? Ha, I found an example on google. Done. > * use source/format 3.0 (quilt) > + so drop quilt build-dep > + and also the include in d/rules can go > + note: I won't upload stuff without d/source/format without a very > good reason. Done. > * d/README.source is outdated. moreover if you move to 3.0 (quilt) you > can just drop it. Done > * d/rules: > + the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS thing about noopt can go, afaik dpkg takes > care of it nowadays Done > + please use dh-autoreconf (aka, #744619, you even have a patch!) Modified the patch, but follow most of it. > + can you use the short dh format? (I can even live without, it's > just I prefer quite more dh over plain debhelper) I have learned to use debhelper and dh does too many magic things for me. Until I understand better how packaging works I will give priority to debhelper over dh. > + for the 'version' variable, please use `dpkg-parsechangelog -S` > instead of sed I don like sed too. But the replacement is different because that variable name "version" is a misnomer. I am stuck on the next changes. I will read documentation to understand what better what I need to do. Meanwhile I am publishing my changes to collab-maint so anyone can review it. > + I didn't really check, but do you really need to do such mess by > generating the .install files at build time? seems, well... doesn't > *look* needed, at least. It is an inheritante from the past. > * you have a librep9.symbols, probably you should rename it, and update > to have the newer symbols, and remove the old ones. > * please bump to debhelper compat 9 > + this will also make (or at least help) make the lib multiarch-able > - for this to work you need to start using dh_auto_configure instead > of manual calling ./configure, though > - note that with this several .install will need an update > - I see you already had troubles with --host and --build configure > flags: 1) I wonder why you need --host at all, we are not > cross-compiling... 2) dh_auto_configure takes care of --build. > - suggestion: stop fiddling so much, and use dh + dh_auto_configure. > * librep-dev.links => no, please. linking /usr/share/doc/<pkg> > directory ain't nice at all, why is that in first place? > + but if you don't want to change it now it's fine, note that just > removing it and let dh take care of it isn't enough, you need a > maintscript for that > + I see there already are preinst snippet to remove the directory. my > reaction to this is: wtf? it does so quite unconditionally and -.-' > * d/copyright: > + I'd appreciate a DEP-5 copyright format (but I can live without) > * trailing whitespaces: > + d/rules:46 > > > it seems that this upload is going to start a library transition. > If so, then you need to upload to experimental, and follow > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions or, am I missing > something? The only revert depends are the sawfish and rep-gtk. But lets follow the transitions guidelines and start by uploading it to experimental. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
