Hi,
>thank you for your help. I'd checked different methods for the symbol >files and I think I found a good one. >I'm using the options "(arch-bits=32) (arch-bits=64)" to separate them. >Thank you for your hint! wonderful >This should work for all builds, which were failed to build. sure, let's see >But I have two questions for now. Which version scheme shell I use? >libechonest/2.3.1-0.2 or libechonest/2.3.1-1? it is fine 0.2 to keep it similar to before >Furthermore it seems someone dislike the using of transitional package >(see #807507). >What should I do? Deleting the transitional package or not? true story, please delete it and upload on mentors! cheers, G.
