On 15-10-28 09:22:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > the packaging looks good to me, I need to do a build&run and a copyright > check.
Thanks for the review :) > However I'm wondering about the discussion on huge files. > Does the package work without them? The package purpose is to take those sound files, process them, and outputs them. The package works, in the sense that you can install it and run it, but you are only going to have any functionality from it. > does the package download them from internet? No, and it doesn't have other cue of where to find those files apart from the README.Debian. I have just talked with upstream, and their stance is that they don't want to promote any data kits over the others, nor make the (incorrect) impression that some data kits are the "official" ones. They are trying to foster the community into creating more data kits, and possibly having a community repo of all the kits. With that in mind, they have friendly shared their opinion that they don't think making downloader packages is a good idea. I have to say that I fail to see a downcoming of having downloader packages. > another question: how do you feel about making it team maintained? > maybe this team fits your needs > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia Good suggestion :). I have talked with them on #debian-multimedia, and I will follow their channels to have them sponsor this package. -- Víctor Cuadrado juan -- E-Mail: <m...@viccuad.me>, OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xA2591E231E251F36 Key fingerprint: E3C5 114C 0C5B 4C49 BA03 0991 A259 1E23 1E25 1F36 My signed E-Mails are trustworthy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
