Your message dated Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <792966543.241129.1441186154441.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#797707: RFS: python-subprocess32/3.2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #797707,
regarding RFS: python-subprocess32/3.2.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
797707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797707
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package of python-subprocess32 [1]. It's
needed resp.
recommended e.g. by ocrodjvu >= 0.9.1, but missing in Debian so far.
I've injected the package into a DPMT repo:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/python-subprocess32.git
Buildlog:
http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/python-subprocess32_3.2.6-1_amd64-20150901-2104.build
Mentors upload:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-subprocess32
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-subprocess32/python-subprocess32_3.2.6-1.dsc
Thanks for consideration,
Daniel Stender
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/797583
ITP: python-subprocess32 -- Py2 backport of Py3 stdlib subprocess module
--
4096R/DF5182C8
46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8
LPI certified Linux Admin (LPI000329859)
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Daniel
>I'm looking for a sponsor for my package of python-subprocess32 [1]. It's
>needed resp.
>recommended e.g. by ocrodjvu >= 0.9.1, but missing in Debian so far.
Lol I read the opposite :)
I did some testing, everything worked as expected.
I couldn't find any nitpick, maybe just please avoid using a different Debian
license
respect to the upstream one.
(if you choose incompatible licenses you might not be able to forward Debian
patches upstream
without relicensing).
So Built&Signed&Uploaded, thanks for your awesome contribution to Debian!
cheers,
G.
--- End Message ---
