Hugo, Sounds good. New package uploaded in the same place (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git-lfs/git-lfs_0.5.4-1.dsc <http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git-lfs/git-lfs_0.5.4-1.dsc>) with the new copyright file. What are the next steps?
Stephen > On Aug 19, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Hugo Lefeuvre <hugo6...@fr33tux.org > <mailto:hugo6...@fr33tux.org>> wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > >>> (1) debian/control: >>> ------------------- >>> >>> - Concerning git "(>= 1.8.0)": The version in jessie-backports is >>> 2.1, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a >>> backport to stable. This condition would also be verified in case >>> of a backport to oldstable since the version in wheezy-backports is >>> 1.9.1. >>> - Concerning golang-go "(>= 1.3.0)": The version in jessie is >>> 1.3.3, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a >>> backport to stable. This condition would also be verified in case >>> of a backport to oldstable since the version in wheezy-backports is >>> 1.3.3. >>> >>> FYI, the Release Team doesn't always accepts backports to stable. >>> However, if the backport of your package is accepted, it will go >>> to the jessie-backports archive[0]. >> >> I completely understand that. My point was that I think it is >> beneficial to keep the version requirements there in case someone >> wants to backport it. That way they will not run into unexpected >> problems. If you don't think that is beneficial I can remove it. > > Anyway, I'm nitpicking. Let it if you want. > > I've made a new review of your package and I've found a last problem > in your d/copyright file: The Expat license paragraph is malformed. > I've attached a correct version. > > Regards, > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Lefeuvre (hugo6390) | www.hugo6390.org > <http://www.hugo6390.org/> > 4096/ ACB7 B67F 197F 9B32 1533 431C AC90 AC3E C524 065E > <copyright.txt>
