Faré <f...@tunes.org> writes: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Christoph Egger > <christ...@christoph-egger.org> wrote: >> Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> writes: >>> There seems to be a somewhat large diff between the "upstream" release >>> and the debian package source? Is this on purpose? >> >> Then the debian package seems to be (almost) the same as the git archive >> but quite different from the tarball >> > Well, this was kind of on purpose. The "upstream" tarball was broken > from the release branch, so I built it from the "minimakefile" branch, > where the release code was fully rewritten in Lisp and debugged, > instead of being a haphazard mix of Makefile, shell scripting and Lisp > code with bits of perl. I believe the debian release script was built > from the release branch, with a tiny commit to debian/rules as > compared to the version tagged 3.1.5 upstream. In all cases, the asdf > code itself is unchanged, but some of the build and packaging files > have been tweaked. > > The situation is therefore not perfect, even though everything in > under source control. I'd hope for a new debian package maintainer to > fix all those kinks; maybe have a separate git branch and/or repo.
Allright, thanks for the explanation! I'll upload then Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fv4f5duf....@anonymous.siccegge.de
