Oops, not Priority: but Urgency:
quidame <quid...@safe-mail.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I try to backport bilibop_0.4.22 source package (native). If only changes > from 0.4.22 to 0.4.22~bpo70+1 are copied in to the changes file, lintian > complains with the 'backports-changes-missing' error tag [1]. If I add > -v0.4.21 dpkg-genchanges, the resulting changes file says: > > Priority: medium > [...] > Closes: 750507 756086 > > This overrides the priority of thr bpo package (low, in wheezy-backports); > medium is the priority of 0.4.22 in unstable. It claims to close two bugs > that are already closed in 0.4.22; more, one of these bugs id specific to > jessie/sid, and the bugfix is reverted in the bpo. should I edit the changes > file to modify Priority: field and modify or remove Closes: field ? Or replave > -v0.4.21 option by something more relevant (shortened changelog entry > for 0.4.22) ? Or can I let it go 'as is' ? > > Cheers, > quidame > > [1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/backports-changes-missing.html > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/n1r-8jve8c2...@safe-mail.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/n1r-nlwieok...@safe-mail.net
