Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review and, maybe final, tests. Thanks.
Cheers, Eriberto Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff <cont...@rudloff.pro> escreveu: > Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the > tarball. > > I added them to the copyright file: https://github.com/Rudloff/ > lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147 > > Thanks again for your help! > > Regards, > > Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> 2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff <cont...@rudloff.pro>: >> >>> 3. >>>>> - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format. >>>>> - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a >>>>> field >>>>> for >>>>> this in the 1.0 format. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example. >>>> You can use these: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/ >>>> netmate/unstable_copyright >>>> >>>> >>>> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ >>>> ext4magic/unstable_copyright >>>> >>> >>> I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now? >>> >> >> >> The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream >> authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above >> (ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25 >> copyright *'. >> >> >> 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from >>>> upstream code. >>>> >>> >>> I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no >>> special >>> step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian >>> folder.) >>> >> >> Yes. Perfect. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Eriberto >> >>