Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review and,
maybe final, tests. Thanks.

Cheers,

Eriberto

Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff <cont...@rudloff.pro>
escreveu:

> Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the
> tarball.
>
> I added them to the copyright file: https://github.com/Rudloff/
> lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147
>
> Thanks again for your help!
>
> Regards,
>
> Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff <cont...@rudloff.pro>:
>>
>>> 3.
>>>>>           - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
>>>>>           - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a
>>>>> field
>>>>> for
>>>>> this in the 1.0 format.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example.
>>>> You can use these:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/
>>>> netmate/unstable_copyright
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/
>>>> ext4magic/unstable_copyright
>>>>
>>>
>>> I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now?
>>>
>>
>>
>> The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream
>> authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above
>> (ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25
>> copyright *'.
>>
>>
>>  6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
>>>> upstream code.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no
>>> special
>>> step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian
>>> folder.)
>>>
>>
>> Yes. Perfect.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Eriberto
>>
>>

Reply via email to