Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> writes: > As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I > haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for > all of them.
Policy, 5.6.6: Priority | This field represents how important it is that the user have the | package installed. See Priorities, Section 2.5. | | When it appears in the debian/control file, it gives the value for the | subfield of the same name in the Files field of the .changes file. It | also gives the default for the same field in the binary packages. Which means: If this is set, i *must* be taken as default for the binary packages (everything else would be a policy violation and therefor an RC bug, right?). Similarly for the Section (Policy, 5.6.5) I am a bit wondering why you don't care about this? Its policy, its the law? > As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, > I haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra > for all of them. Shall I file these bugs to dak? Best Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fvgzossz....@baikal.ole.ath.cx
