❦ 24 décembre 2013 00:15 CET, Thomas Leonard <tal...@gmail.com> :
> That's currently the case, but probably won't be for long. The next > version (which is nearly ready) is written in OCaml rather than > Python. At that point, I'll probably separate the GTK plugin from the > main binary. It wuld be better to make the split at this point. Currently, you are replacing one package by one regular package and two empty packages. Each packages comes at a cost (entries in the package database), so we try to keep their number down. > I could keep it as a single package (I don't really mind). Would it > trigger any warnings to include a binary that depends on symbols that > aren't required dependencies of the package? You'll get a build warning but nothing from Lintian I think. But once you have something to put in the 0install package, there is no problem for the split. -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
