Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2013, 13:01 +0200 schrieb Samuel Mehrbrodt: > Am 20.06.2013 09:46, schrieb Daniel Beyer: > > I think you tried to open an ITP using reportbug. In this case you > > should have received an email with a subject in the form "Bug#NNNNNN: > > Acknowledgement (ITP: ...". It might worth checking your SPAM for such a > > message. If you did not get such a message, your bugreport most likely > > never left your local system. > I didn't get an email, but when I use reportbug again, it says the > package already exists. So it seems that it has worked.
That's kind of strange. I for myself can not find an issue with "expo" in the title, that is filled out against the WNPP pseudo-bug (which does not mean it is not out there). Can you provide some more details here? Please note that I'm not a DD, so my capabilities to help you are limited. > Ok, I changed the upload method to ftp and now it is uploaded. But it > doesn't appear on the site and I didn't get an email either. > Here's the output: > > ... > Uploading to mentors (via ftp to mentors.debian.net): > Uploading exposong_0.8.dsc: 553 Could not create file. > Leaving existing exposong_0.8.dsc on the server and continuing > NOTE: This existing file may have been previously uploaded partially. > For official Debian upload queues, the dcut(1) utility can be > used to remove this file, and after an acknowledgement mail is > received in response to dcut, the upload can be re-initiated. > Uploading exposong_0.8.tar.gz: done. > Uploading exposong_0.8_all.deb: done. > Uploading exposong_0.8_amd64.changes: done. > Successfully uploaded packages. > Did you build the package with option '-sa' to include the source? Anyway I wonder about the "NOTE:" message. Never seen this one with my uploads to mentors.debian.net. You might want to use dcut, as dput suggests (that's what I would do in your position). > > > If you think your packaging is in a good shape, you were right uploading > > it to mentors.debian.net. If not done so far, you might additionally > > want to put the packaging under some version control (e.g. using git) > > and publish it (e.g. on github) . > Which files should I put under version control? The debian/ directory > with the information to generate the packages is already under source > control. > Forget about this one. It looks like we are talking about https://code.google.com/p/exposong/ and you are an active developer there. Since this project has its Debian packaging self-contained, there is no need to put it separately somewhere else. > Samuel -- Daniel Swiss
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
