Hi, > Since no one else here seems to be wondering, I'll just ask myself: Is > there any reason why the package is going to be renamed to "premake4", > i.e. appending the major version to the package name? > > If this is going to get uploaded as "premake4", this is technically not > an adoption of "premake" but a NEW upload of "premake4". > > If you really mean to adopt "premake", you should rename the package > from "premake4" to "premake" unless version 3 and 4 are fundamentally > different and it makes sense to keep both versions in the archive.
As I recall it was discussed earlier. Please read [1][2] and maybe even whole thread if you have time and wish. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/12/msg00282.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/12/msg00283.html Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3474101365286...@web7f.yandex.ru
