On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:51:26 +0100 Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote:
> * Antonio Ospite <osp...@studenti.unina.it>, 2013-03-19, 16:15: > >for a package I am working on, I am setting versioned Build-Depends, to > >avoid using newer libav versions which would break compilation, e.g.: > > > > libavcodec-dev (<< 6:9) > > > >Compilation under pbuilder for Sid goes fine, but the binary packages > >are still allowed to be installed with newer libav binary packages: > > > > libavcodec53 (>= 6:0.8.3-1~) | libavcodec-extra-53 (>= 6:0.8.5) > > A well-behaved shared library package won't break binary compatibility > without changing package name. In fact, the package name has changed to > libavcodec54. So nothing wrong with the dependency as far as I can tell. > Maybe I've picked the wrong example, the actual problem was with libavdevice53, the same soname is used for either 0.8.5-1 and 9.3-1, but 9.3-1 links to libavcodec54 while 0.8.5-1 links to libavcodec53, so my binary ended up importing either libavcodec53 and libavcodec54 when both were installed and did not work. I think it will be enough to require libavdevice53 (<< 6:9) in my case. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130320155413.b8798d09e5005c0425f81...@studenti.unina.it
