(Sorry for the late reply. Somehow your mail fell through the cracks...)
* Giulio Paci <giuliop...@gmail.com>, 2013-01-13, 13:56:
Would it be possible to exclude binary files from the being analysed
by licensecheck?
Done.
Now debian/source/include-binaries can be dropped.
Is there a reason you explicitly enable building static libraries?
Just to mimic openfst.
But I have to say that openfst upstream suggests static libraries for
performance reasons, while opengrm-ngram upstream suggests no static
libraries for compilation speed reasons.
Do you prefer if I drop the static libraries?
If I were the maintainer, I wouldn't bother to enable them.
But I'm okay with keeping them, too.
Do you know how the files in src/testdata/* were generated? I wonder if
we have the full source for it.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130227122716.ga9...@jwilk.net
