Your message dated Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:20:34 +0000
with message-id <e1u6vju-0008ra...@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: 0install/1.12-2 [ITP] -- rename
zeroinstall-injector package
has caused the Debian Bug report #685998,
regarding RFS: 0install/1.12-2 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
685998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors,
I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into
separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. Could someone
check it and approve the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter
Secher) is no longer a DD.
It now builds these binary packages:
0install-core (contains the code)
0install (metapackage that depends on 0install-core and GTK)
zeroinstall-injector (transitional package so that using the old
package name still works)
I updated the name as "injector" is no longer used, and the main command is now
"0install".
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_1.11-1.dsc
More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net.
Regards,
T. Leonard
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package 0install has been removed from mentors.
--- End Message ---
