tags 665199 - patch pending thanks On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:40:52AM -0300, gustavo panizzo <gfa> wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for openldap (versioned as 2.4.31-1.1) > attached is the diff between the sources as nmudiff shows Have you tested this patch? Because 'upgrade' is not the argument passed to postinst scripts on upgrade; this appears to be a complete no-op. Also, the upgrade case is already handled in the postinst_upgrade_configuration function. If load_databases needs to be done including when the database format has not changed, this should be handled here. This change should not be uploaded to unstable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature