On 08/01/2012 07:00 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:15:18PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
>> Some of the bugs are fixed in the upload at m.d.n are not RC, but still
>> pretty annoying. To get a freeze-exception, would I need to remove those
>> changes?
>
> What are the bug severities of these "pretty annoying" bugs ?
I mostly estimated them as "normal" or "minor", but I'm not really
experienced classifying bugs, so you or other reviewers could come to a
different conclusion. That's why I asked for a review of these bugs.
Specifically, these are:
#682931: The freefoam-log utility fails on truncated logs
#682932: The freefoam-log utility writes to $PWD/logs/ instead of
<case>/logs/
#682934: The -doc and -srcDoc options fail to find the Doxygen docs
#683175: Template files /usr/share/freefoam/data/templates/* should be
in /usr/share/freefoam/templates
#683176: The /usr/share/freefoam/data/foamLog.db is in the wrong place
and package
#683369: The API documentation is unusable
>
>> Also, would this upload to to unstable, or to testing directly?
>
> I suggest to go via unstable, because this is possible for this package.
> Please mark RFS 682893 as blocked by RFS 683500 to keep unstable available.
Will do, thanks.
>
>> Lastly, what is the appropriate revision number? I chose to stick with 1
>> since I added the +dfsg suffix, but I'm not sure this is appropriate
>> since it is also the second revision based on the 0.1.0 upstream version.
>
> Your choice 0.1.0+dfsg-1 is good.
Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bart Martens
>
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5019794b.50...@users.sourceforge.net
