-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 07:40 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Let me rephrase. > > Is upstream aware of the above bugs which affected the last version of > defrag in debian, which were not fixed in the upstream code?
They appear to fall into 3 categories: ftbs, upstream has abandoned, and doesn't work on ext3/4. I have fixed the third, and obviously the first two no longer hold. > Generally, Debian packages stable releases of software. At the current > state is this package ready for unstable or better suited for > experimental? Has it seen wider testing / user base? (e.g. did you post > an announce to ext-dev mailing lists? LWN.net? similar sites). > > This is a bit of chicken and egg problem: no package no user base, no > user base no package. > > I believe that inclusion of this package in Debian will increase testing. > > Do you believe this should be uploaded into experimental or unstable? Exactly. I was planning on announcing it once it's in the archive to call for testing and feedback. The usage of experimental is still unclear to me. If it is in unstable then it will be synced to Ubuntu quantal as well, though I suppose Ubuntu users can get it from my ppa if it is holding in experimental for now. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP57uHAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75g3cIALHX+eSZU9fu36oTQIrf5Mt0 eUkr/mGwKvyJpTu+Vd7I8fd02lEXZxYVOU4FZiBa0s+mWR8M6Gjjs0PAmPZTamwm rPj6Ss2xaV+aRCxxLxqcDBasIprKopikqq288A8plKQEXV5mLAOhmFI+I6s4PT3b 108svDCqZ8x1eFzWic1px+J2iQGBjQef4DUIeOGZ50GFwnoup3Fq4pAf8FCiCdfZ KKW3KvOgY0DF6bpp9ZyoscJ6rhqIvDQDmguYbghUO3ZHAuE9nie5vm8dyPXIm6CL AuraSud1wmYugzBO1SUqY9RyiU3ZUj0eN+9KUAU3+qsOBf/YHWu8s6kIrC4t1nM= =ioI4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe7bb87.4090...@ubuntu.com
