On 22/05/12 09:57, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-05-21 17:38, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 21/05/12 10:02, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >>> [...] >>>> - - make a lintian override to suppress the warning, with a comment to >>>> explain I am using -release deliberately for resiprocate? >>> I'm not sure you want to keep the current names for the lib and the dev >>> symlink (but if you do, then probably you should override the warning). >>> >> >> Now I get exactly the type of filenames described in the manual: >> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Release-numbers.html#Release-numbers >> >> e.g. >> usr/lib/librutil.so -> usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so >> >> The .0.0.0 suffixes are gone, but I still have the lintian warnings >> >> As this scenario is valid from the libtool manual, it is acceptable to >> use the override for lintian? >> >>> [...] > > Hi, > > As far as I can tell, you do not ship the symlink in the dev package (or > any other package for that matter)[1], so in that sense, Lintian is right. >
I was shipping the symlink before After the discussion of the issue, I changed libresiprocate-1.8-dev.install ( commit 36bc8a81f9f29 ) to that it doesn't install the links Should I revert that change, and install usr/lib/librutil.so ? > That being said, Lintian does have a bug here, which should be fixed in > commit 714b4ec[2]. > > ~Niels > > [1] > > $ find -name librutil.so > ./rutil/.libs/librutil.so > ./debian/tmp/usr/lib/librutil.so > > $ find -name librutil-1.8.so > ./rutil/.libs/librutil-1.8.so > ./debian/libresiprocate-1.8/usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so > ./debian/tmp/usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so > > [2] > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=714b4ecdd59577792eac4006fc3b0b834bacb949 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbb6689.50...@trendhosting.net
