On 21/05/12 19:35, Andy Hawkins wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:26:43PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are >> not 100% reliable > > Yeah, I've been following that. > >> $ hardening-check flactag >> flactag: >> Position Independent Executable: yes >> Stack protected: yes >> Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found) >> Read-only relocations: yes >> Immediate binding: yes >> >> $ hardening-check discid >> discid: >> Position Independent Executable: yes >> Stack protected: no, not found! > > I think this is the key. The discid binary is so simple it may well not have > a stack! The 'main' function is barely 10 lines long, and just instantiates > a very simple class. >
I wonder if that is justification to make a lintian-override for that warning? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbab097.7080...@trendhosting.net
