Hi Arno,

On 15 May 2012 08:51, Arno Töll <a...@debian.org> wrote:
> * You declare the debhelper compat[ibility] to be 9, but you build
> depend on "debhelper (>= 9)". Please use a version which actually
> supports the finalized level 9. That is 9.20120115.

No need to impose this requirement because non-finalized versions are
not present in the archive:
    
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=debhelper&searchon=names&suite=all&section=all

IMHO "debhelper (>= 9)" would be perfectly fine.
Moreover this is a common practice.

Strict dependency would be justified only if there were any particular
bugs in prior 9.20120115 but even then we could safely use (>= 9)
simply because no "broken" versions are present in the archive.

Please share your concerns if I'm missing anything.

Thank you.

Regards,
Dmitry.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CANBdODUmaF0jaELwaQrPOS2hmmmWjDuhV-ncx2rJF-c9bZ=M=a...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to