On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs"
>>
>> * Package name : autofs
>> Version : 5.0.6-1
There's one more issue with the new package. I already
told Ian about it, but apparently he ignored it. This
new code being added as a patch to debian package,
originally from upstream author:
++static inline unsigned int linux_version_code(void)
++{
++ struct utsname my_utsname;
++ unsigned int p, q, r;
++
++ if (uname(&my_utsname))
++ return 0;
++
++ p = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(my_utsname.release, "."));
++ q = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, "."));
++ r = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, "."));
++ return KERNEL_VERSION(p, q, r);
++}
This will break with 2-number kernel version string. There
were several tools who assumed 3-component version string
and who broke when 3.0-rc come out, so Linus decided to
postprone defaulting to 2-component version. Many packages
has been fixed since, but here autofs introduces a new bug
of the same theme.
Note that actually the version check isn't really necessary
since the issue for which it has been added is now resolved
in the kernel.
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa60a54.50...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
