> It has been suggested by a respected reviewer that while I am removing the > unsourced binaries, I remove ALL of the "convenience copies of code". That > way > the unused code would not confuse anyone. > > I thought, that when creating a dfsg tarball, one should remove only the > files > with licensing problems. > > What is the proper procedure? Remove only the unsourced binaries, or all of > the unused code?
I don't have any documentation on it, but what I have seen is that you should not start repacking lightly. But as you already need to repack, removing other files for a good reason is fine. I believe convenience copies are exactly such a case. Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
