Le Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 07:04:08PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov a écrit : > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> wrote: > > > I also think that we should refrain from using short and common names for > > the > > What about "repagen" i.e. REadable PAssword GENerator ? Is it OK.?
That is nice. Good luck for solving the other problems raised in that thread and finding a sponsor. Debian has thousands of packages. Each of them has an imprint on our ecosystem. Consider for instance that if one day you suddenly can not contribute anymore, somebody else will need to care of the package. Summed together, even removals takes time. In the future, Debian wants to set up a personal package archive system like in Ubuntu. That would be an ideal first stage for packages like yours, where they can demonstrate they have an audience, before entering the main distribution. This said, it is good to pick a unique name in advance, and "repagen" illustrates well the point of the package. It looks like that there is a trademarked cosmetic of the same name, but fields of use are different enough. Or pehraps unreadable passwords are bad for the skin in the long term ;) Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120407001444.ga3...@falafel.plessy.net
