On 01/27/2012 07:09 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Stephen M. Webb <stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca>, 2012-01-27, 18:20: >> * debian/rules: add --with autoreconf to regenerate autoconfigury > > A typo, though I'm not sure which word you had in mind. :P
I don't see the typo. I added "--with autoreconf" to regenerate the autoconfigury (config.guess, config.sub, aclocal.m4, ltmain.sh, libtools, etc). It's all terminology I've used on other projects. Is there a preferred way to phrase this on Debian? >> * debian/control: tweaked for multi-arch > > Could you be more explicit about how it was tweaked? > > BTW, you could add "Multi-Arch: same" field to all 3 packages, so that > there's an actual benefit from installing stuff into multi-arch > directories. :) I did the minimum necessary to go to debhelper compat level 9. Do you suggest it's better to go whole-enchilada multi-arch? I'm not anticipating bi-arch installs or cross-builds, but I guess it doesn't really hurt. I'm just less familiar with the consequences of multi-arch so I was being conservative. > I see test failures in my build log: Me too. The tests rely on manually configuring the OS is a specific, non-standard way. Should I just disable the test targets during the build to reduce the noise? -- Stephen M. Webb <stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f235cea.2080...@bregmasoft.ca
