"Thijs Kinkhorst" <th...@debian.org> writes: > On Mon, January 16, 2012 23:26, Paul Wise wrote: >>> I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until >>> now. >> >> It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/642801 > > My experience until now is that it's mature in dpkg. It does the job just > like other source formats, for me. > > It's indeed not accepted in the Debian archive and also tools like Lintian > don't support it. So it depends on your goals whether you can call it > mature. It works very well for a local package I maintain. > > > Thijs
There is a lot of different opinions about wether the format is sane at all. A problem with the basic idea/design of 3.0 (git) as opposed to the maturity of the implementation. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5t583v4.fsf@frosties.localnet