On 12/19/2011 01:55 PM, Scott Howard wrote: > Since your title said "github tags," I think you're looking for: > http://githubredir.debian.net/ > > The source code is there if you're not on github. > > Cheers, > Scott >
Hi Scott, thanks for your quick answer. I'm now cross-posting in -mentors. In my case, upstream tagged "master/1.3", and I'm getting issues still, with uscan. zigo@node4407:~/sources/xen-api/xen-api$ cat debian/watch version=3 http://githubredir.debian.net/github/jonludlam/xen-api (.*).tar.gz but then, I have the following error: zigo@node4407:~/sources/xen-api/xen-api$ uscan --verbose --report -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: http://githubredir.debian.net/github/jonludlam/xen-api (.*).tar.gz -- Found the following matching hrefs: /github/jonludlam/xen-api/0~master.tar.gz /github/jonludlam/xen-api/master/1.3.tar.gz dpkg: warning: version '/master/1.3' has bad syntax: version number does not start with digit Newest version on remote site is /master/1.3, local version is 1.3 dpkg: warning: version '/master/1.3' has bad syntax: version number does not start with digit => Newer version available from http://githubredir.debian.net/github/jonludlam/xen-api/master/1.3.tar.gz -- Scan finished FYI, I really am packaging version 1.3, so uscan should find out that I'm up-to-date. I tried to poke with opts="uversionmangle=s/^master\///" to remove "master/" from the version of upstream git repo, but no luck... Upstream is friendly, so I can ask to remove the annoying bits of the versions, but there's already 9 packages involved, so I'd be glad to find a solution keeping upstream scheme, that would be less work and forcing "git push/pull --force --tags" to everyone working on the project is annoying. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eeee49f.2090...@debian.org