Paul Elliott <pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com> writes:

> On Friday, March 25, 2011 01:43:59 am Ben Finney wrote:
> > What I thought you were referring to was that the images were a
> > binary form and the “preferred form for making modifications” wasn't
> > included, hence making the source package non-free. Is that the case
> > for this package?
>
> It is just some logo that the upstream released.

For determining whether the source package is free, the above questions
should be answered to your satisfaction (with an eye to the fact that
they ultimately need to be answered to the Debian ftpmasters's
satisfaction).

Feel free to make use of the ‘debian-legal’ forum for the details.

-- 
 \         “People's Front To Reunite Gondwanaland: Stop the Laurasian |
  `\              Separatist Movement!” —wiredog, http://kuro5hin.org/ |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Attachment: pgpVEwJ1auKQB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to