-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-10 21:14, Doug Springer wrote: > Niels, > I took over from the original developer, and parcellite is no longer > inactive. >
Hey, That sounds good. > There is a fork, it's called clipit, but there were lots of changes > occurring, and I thought that parcellite (after a few bugs were > addressed) was just fine as it was. I don't mind simple features, but > once it looks like klipper, what's the point? > Yes, clipit was the fork I was thinking of. As pabs mentioned in a separate email, clipit is currently its own package but there was talk about replacing parcellite with it. > My intent it to primarily bug fix/build fix, add bare essentials from > time to time, and keep parcellite just as it is - but I've sent Andrew > several emails and no response yet. I figured if he doesn't want to > maintain it, I'll take over that part as well. > > How do I go about doing that? > As far as I can tell, the maintainer of parcellite is definitely active, since he uploaded a version of parcellite 5 days ago[1]. I have CC'ed Andrew, whom I hope will reply within a couple of days. If you want an active part in maintaining parcellite, your best option right is to offer to become a co-maintainership. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/parcellite/news/20110306T041708Z.html > Best Regards, > Doug Springer > > > On 03/10/2011 12:53 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-03-10 15:40, doug Springer wrote: > >>>> Hi, >>>> I started developing parcellite because I didn't want it to disappear >>>> from the repositories. >>>> >>>> I've been developing parcellite for several months now and have a new >>>> release that's been tested and packaged to i386 and amd64. I'd like to >>>> see this make it into main stream. >>>> >>>> Where do I go from here? I'll can take over the maintenance if I need >>>> to. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Doug Springer >>>> >>>> >>>> > Hey, > > I remember parcellite from a while back; as I recall I managed to reach > the maintainer via his other email: andrewsometh...@ubuntu.com > That being said; the last I heard was that parcellite was being > replaced by a fork, since parcellite was inactive. Unfortunately the > name of the fork eludes me at the time. > > ~Niels > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNed/3AAoJEAVLu599gGRCMIEQAKh2gxbWftckB0/iSkGOcy/v ItL+CX2/EKKVAJUWS+wrnIihJBu5NQnv2LAp/HQT51h/l1CIbwYA0VnKVZ6lwzuT Za74JrDcai+AG/e76an2Nuru3UxJGscUVS5UP0WZ82FWBGWneVwn51GOpY6K7HHg LoMnQaoPQ3MjpfWN8r6tqbMXIAPbbXsmu9S1mHWvWvarNrdan3+xsTlpWccRvr+B 5kgvKbFJjfcROo/nZ4iApD/4Pj6W7M5ujlNjncIYulEJtOpdQHMUU1eX+P/KyB1e I0wVav15Ego/sbRKBxaZ3izkt1pSxmJAlBfP6kKVJS7Df6X2h1sgzkBpnbRfgyJ5 o7VeAME7ZsczK8JFXiqpdat/DkZODYiBMLQwi2IJ3PwieqorYfp/CyU1299ELcfw lasbJ9mfTampI/XGE3CIF5no4VJE5GgJJrEzTQ81Dj7FmjvWLy2dwIG8vlm005qg 1GLfXhhCm32SDTkQcFSH9GrIu40hexCAs2IJc51ByUjDJGp28Uh3mKr5PuWKU/de lVsOFg+P6zBjCojS7E+dVdQnsUH3GJ1MhlZ3hM35Z4T4Yhp6wRoT6dw6skDGk4HL btG7hul1zpoq2RY7mRpUFQ8P18swGWtbfqWd3gHUMyUrxNnUwA+O88yZLd76foRV Sh2DKff5MjU64ayQymPn =CqKP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d79dff8.6020...@thykier.net
