On 01/15/2011 02:02 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > I didn't want to offense you in any way by saying you might not be > familiar with git. I'm sorry if it sounded like that... > Did it sound like I was offended ? I was not! :) > I see your point with branch names. > But I don't think there is a real consensus on the naming, for instance > the X strike force name them debian-unstable, upstream-unstable > (and same with -experimental). > Well, calling it "debian-unstable" or "debian-sid" is the same to me. The point is having a branch per version of Debian ! > And the first reference I read: git-buildpackage's documentation 'just' > use master, upstream and pristine-tar. > Ok. > Certainly, but I really have no idea here. > Maybe we could check some versions: > I'm using debhelper 8.0.0, dh-autoreconf 2 and autoconf 2.67-2. > This is the exact versions I have as well on my laptop. > Do you have any other idea to tackle this ? > I don't know. The thing is, if I do a fresh install, or use pbuilder, it might work, but I'd like to find out what's going on. I'll try to investigate more and I will let you know.
Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d31b232.5000...@debian.org
