-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-01-11 23:05, Fernando Mercês wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pev". > > * Package name : pev > Version : 0.22-1 > Upstream Author : Fernando Mercês <ferna...@mentebinaria.com.br> > * URL : http://coding40.mentebinaria.com.br > * License : GPL > Section : utils > > It builds these binary packages: > pev - Utility to the get Product Version of PE32 executables > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 608460 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: This is a program that I > wrote and I'm a big Debian fan and user for five years. I really want to > contribute do project by starting a maintainer life. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pev > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pev/pev_0.22-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards, > Fernando Mercês >
Hey I had a look at your package: d/copyright: - I guess "Source: ftp://ftp.example.com/pub/games" should be updated. - I believe it has a few syntax errors (e.g. email written on their own line) For repeated licenses I believe the right notation is Files: a Copyright: ... License: GPL-3+ Files: b Copyright: ... License: GPL-3+ License: GPL-3+ Yada yada yada But I could be wrong here. There is a new tool to check the DEP-5 format[1], though all though it still has some quirks (see the thread for more info). Just a heads up if you try it; it has been reported that the --save option made undesired changes to copyright file[2]. d/rules: I think there is no need to override dh_auto_install. As I recall when there is exactly one package dh_auto_install will do exactly what you are doing in your override target. d/control: - Any particular reason not to put the Homepage: field in the source entry? All package entries will inherit it if they do not have they own and in this way the Homepage field will also appear in the dsc file. - Why the build-depends on debhelper 7.3.8? Based on your rules file you could do with 7.0.50~ (or even 7 if you remove the override target). It is perfectly fine if debhelper >= 7.3.8 fixed some issue that your package triggers with older debhelpers. ~Niels [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00381.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00410.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNMCH9AAoJEAVLu599gGRCLOUP/icE3kYnaJFMZhK37qJ0aIk1 Oq8cV2b5k75zYji6RzhC1jj2ecJ/nxx+2FqxS4vmjgyu35HIU6m/V81MEmw1kizs Q0BxhE0sMnNjRAR24Gm61yglYgtB/wijX170owZ83gfPkACeVj3MKmEYYFaO5ZGZ sVvRBHAmSerqpTvlvBNCNAjINBfAE3XJ1lxGpTiCTMnyoyNnCdKoTjYlpa0V+KHf HbWwOOXTBZJOBDUc1FLc3KJbQ5OlhK7fqLblUN+snyhTze4PHuBPB87ZpWKxbOwj aKM4E9ykTuZmyDMcXdWl2GquT9427Yder+pdSzj282bYyNs0Im1xGn2j70gzxICh IVgsZ4avuIqVfrcGdHDdzgqOskK3cSSrqH1GyYkfHCPs0lqnivStHH/8+46bAumD YmJyCLCu8KovJX6ApisY1SKXLoPStZedNufC4/QUXk28t/bDG4Wge9XiiR6CAjJa /taxhWnGzjOhM2880z0TRa8u4R5FxGrISzUTIpUuLj2fNd0Cb7jIicrUNtS1J2Wu w6FpKxkskipszfIeIUSg4I2dsDMFpbuybDH5YJUCcFtGaxbyWrcHffknRoKfKaaP o9EEZ9Ilc5rGKZVno9GNdwiHMOYaL36wUyQ6ZBZdHtpRdyhitR+utZQUVyzBdeLr 9YyBO1Y9kXv8L2r1HfyB =G9UY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3021fd.9040...@thykier.net