Thanks for checking, Jakub, On 10.12.2010 19:42, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * "Uploaders:" is empty. If the package doesn't have any co-maintainers, > * just remove the field.
... removed. > * Why "Priority: extra"? Right, switched to "optional". > * "Section: tex" would be better than "misc". Reasonable, done. I've followed Texworks with both, but Texmaker has also this. > * Regarding the package description, is it important that the software > is written in C? I'd omit this information. Right that's useless, fixed. > * Dependencies on shared library packages are normally generated > automatically by dpkg-shlibdeps. Unless you known what you are doing, > you should not put explicit names of shared library packages into Depends. All right, fixed. > BTW, dpkg-shlibdeps issues a couple of warnings: > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libfontconfig.so.1 could be > avoided if "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked > against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libatk-1.0.so.0 could be avoided > if "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked against it > (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libm.so.6 could be avoided if > "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked against it (they > use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librt.so.1 could be avoided if > "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked against it (they > use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgmodule-2.0.so.0 could be > avoided if "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked > against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgthread-2.0.so.0 could be > avoided if "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked > against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 could be > avoided if "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked > against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libfreetype.so.6 could be avoided > if "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked against it > (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 could be > avoided if "debian/gummi/usr/bin/gummi" were not uselessly linked > against it (they use none of its symbols). Yes. Mhm ... I've forwarded this to the developers. > * debian/watch is... weird. How about something like this: > > version=3 > http://dev.midnightcoding.org/redmine/projects/gummi/files \ > /redmine/attachments/download/(?:\d+)/gummi-(.+)\.tar\.gz Fixed. > * Lintian complains: > I: gummi source: quilt-patch-missing-description changeset_r637.diff > * Apparently new upstream version (0.5.5) is available. That one is the same as 0.5.4 + changeset_r637.diff. I've bumped to 0.5.5-1 and removed the patch: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gummi/gummi_0.5.5-1.dsc > * Toolbar looks a bit appalling here (see the attachment). Mhmm, don't know what happened there, but here it's o.k. Greetings, Daniel -- http://www.danielstender.com/granthinam/ GPG key ID: 1654BD9C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d0287fa.3040...@danielstender.com
