* Tomasz Muras <tom...@muras.eu> [100824 19:34]:
> So to summarize:
> dfsg is a conventional way of naming a package, when the original
> source has been changed. It usually happens when upstream software
> contains some non-free elements.
I do not think using "dfsg" makes sense if it was not repacked to
remove non-dfsg-free stuff.
For other reasons I think "ds" is sometimes chosen. (Though there
are not really that many other legitimate reasons).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20100824205549.gb13...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
