Chris Baines <cbain...@gmail.com> writes:

> Sorry, replying to my own message, I have just stumbled upon the Debian
> Shared Library Packaging guide
> (http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#naminglibpkg
>  ). Which explains the solution to my problem.
>
> Chris
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:46 +0100, Chris Baines wrote:
>> Hello Mentors,
>> 
>> I am looking at releasing the next upstream version of simgear as this
>> is holding back both one of my upcoming packages (fgrun) and the
>> upgrading of the FlightGear program. 
>> 
>> The source package (old) currently produces two binary packages
>> simgear1.9.1 and simgear-dev. I am wondering why the former package is
>> named simgear1.9.1 and not just simgear as 1.9.1 is the version? 
>> 
>> Initially I thought it was because is allows it to be installed
>> alongside another version of the package but this is not possible as it
>> conflicts with all other versions of simgear.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Chris

But then you have to fix the package so it can be installed alongside
another version. Otherwise having different names is pointless.

MfG
        Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq3xe3f0....@frosties.localdomain

Reply via email to