On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:16:08 Bilal Akhtar wrote: > Isn't this a sexist package?
Sexist against women? Maybe. At the very least, "notorious" has a had a negative denotaion since the 1600s, and probably shouldn't be applied without good justification. I'd prefer a more neutral or positive term be used. "Famous" is probably sufficient. Sexist against men? Probably. Excluding quotes from this package on the sole grounds that they are from a male is the very definition of sexist. That said, I don't find it to be offensive sexism; it is simple categorization with no ulterior motives that I can imagine. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
