Il 13/05/2010 6.27, Yavor Doganov ha scritto: >> Also, could you please consider including patch I prepared for Ubuntu? >> http://patches.ubuntu.com/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.19.3-1ubuntu1.patch > > Hmm, how come that gnustep-base-common is in Build-Depends-Indep? Are > such things allowed in theory and practice? It seems to me that there > will be a bootstrap issue, e.g. for new ports. Or maybe not, since > -common is arch:all and buildds use -B. I'm not sure, but it doesn't > look very elegant to me.
Yes, but I didn't find a better way to instruct buildds to take into acoounts those DTDs. > Anyway, some time ago a different solution was proposed: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-dev/2010-02/msg00035.html > > I'll test it and if it works, will ask upstream to comment/consider > the patch for inclusion. This approach is way more safe to me. I could give it a go on my PPA to see if buildtime is limited and compare resulting documentation. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna <dktrkr...@debian.org> `. `' `-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
