On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:14:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > A review: > > The first 3 symbols in the symbols file look like they might be > internal symbols that should not be exported, is that the case? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
It seems that the symbols where supposed to be internal originally but they are documented[0] and used by denemo[1][2] (my another ITA)[2]. Which could be the right way to proceed in this case?. 1. Keep it "as is" right now, and ask to upstream to clean up the API fot the next version? (to make clear which symbols are public and private). 2. Request to upstream to change the API (doc and visibility) and then request to denemo upstream to update their software, and then make the packages. 3. another? BTW, Denemo is already in debian, but is using an embedded copy of libsmf. > The SONAME should not be added to the -dev or utils packages. I'd > recommend naming the utils package smf-utils ... Changed :). http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libsmf/libsmf_1.3-1.dsc Thanks for your help. [0] http://libsmf.sourceforge.net/api/globals.html [1] http://ur1.ca/u5ng [2] http://denemo.org [3] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/denemo/denemo_0.8.14-1.dsc -- Josué M. Abarca S. Vos mereces Software Libre. PGP key 4096R/70D8FB2A 2009-06-17 fingerprint = B3ED 4984 F65A 9AE0 6511 DAF4 756B EB4B 70D8 FB2A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
