Jérémy Lal <je...@edagames.com> writes: > Imagine this common use case : > - create an ITP
(missing step here: do all the packaging work. I raise this only because it's distressingly common for people to announce their “Intent To Package” long after they've already done it.) > - then make the package available for sponsors (say, on mentors), > - then send an RFS > - later (sometimes a lot later, or even never), the package is uploaded > > Is there already a standard way of showing in the ITP > that an RFS has been sent ? I will often use the BTS to modify the ITP bug report by adding the “pending” tag (meaning: this bug report is fixed, pending an upload of a new release). -- \ “We tend to scoff at the beliefs of the ancients. But we can't | `\ scoff at them personally, to their faces, and this is what | _o__) annoys me.” —Jack Handey | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
