Hello, Joachim Wiedorn <ad_deb...@joonet.de> wrote:
> > I see that you added a description to your patches. This is a very good > > thing. > > Note that there is a standardisation effort for patch descriptions. I > > recommend > > you to try it next time: ‘http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/’. > Still now I have seen so many different descriptions in patches. So I I have looked back the last 7 months on debian-devel and some of my questions are clear now. > am not sure which version is the best form. But there is one essential > topic for me I'm missing in DEP-3: there are no line with the file name. It seems nobody need the filename inside patch files - only myself. Does anyone know a solution? > The other thing is, I always want to have a sign "#" at the beginning > of descriptions as distinction to the usual content of the patch files. It seems "#" can be used similar to dpatch. That is a good message. And one item is not solved: where should I write the package name inside the patch file? I think it is important. Fondest regards, Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
