Hi, Christoph. On Dec 11 2009, Christoph Egger wrote: > The changes are actually minimal for a new upstream release (I > was not reacting as I was expecting way more).
Fair enough. > Did you consider adopting the package if it does matter much for > you? While being updated through QA is good having a real Maintainer > is of course the idea state for a package Yes, I did consider that, but I'm overwhelmed with some other QA work that I'm doing. Just for the record, I'm currently evaluating if it is feasible to maintain xpdf or not. Also, I am happy to say that at least two of the packages that I got to do QA updates were, *very* shortly afterwards, adopted by other people. The packages that I have in mind are gphotofs and id3lib3.8.3, which were gathering dust. I am including the -qa list here so that the are away of my efforts and interests (which I already briefly told to Barry deFreese privately). > > dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fondu/fondu_0.0.20051010-1.dsc > > Uploaded. Thank you again. Regards, Rogério Brito. -- Rogério Brito : rbr...@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
