Thank's for your answer! I'm the upstream, and I think I understood the litian warnings but not their consequenses.
>> W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib >> usr/lib/valide/plugins/file-browser/file-browser.png >> W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib >> usr/lib/valide/plugins/opened-documents/opened-documents.png >> W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib >> usr/lib/valide/plugins/symbol/symbol-browser.png > > These should be installed to /usr/share instead. You might need to > patch the source to install them in the right place. See here for why: > > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/image-file-in-usr-lib.html > If it's a critical warning, I can fix it, but I prefer to have all files in the same directory. >> W: valide-common: extra-license-file usr/share/valide/COPYING > > Unless the application needs it, there is no reason to install this file. > > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/extra-license-file.html > Yes the application use the COPYING file for show the license in the about dialog. >> W: valide: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libvalide-0.0.so.0.7.0 >> usr/lib/libvalide-0.0.so >> W: valide: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libvalide-0.0-0 > > I imagine these are not meant to be public libraries. If they are > supposed to be private, please work with upstream to make them private > libraries (install in a subdir of /usr/lib). If they are meant to be > public libraries, you need to read libpkg-guide and the bugs filed > against it. > This library is used by the core application, if it's not placed in /usr/lib I have the classic error: valide: error while loading shared libraries: libvalide-0.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I think that the library is in the good directory (like Anjuta). Is it reasonable to have six packages for this simple application? -- Nicolas Joseph http://www.valaide.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
