On Tue, Nov 03 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 03 Nov 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> provide assurances that the SVG no longer exists at all. You probably
>> also should be generating the icons on the fly from the SVG using
>> inkscape as you build the package.
>
> What??? That is a joke, right?
>
> If everyone would start using inkscape for building icons that are pre-made
> then ... well, build-deps are exploding.
So?
> I consider this wrong behaviour.
No, it would be the right behaviour. Even of gcc, cpp, and ldd
are huge, we do not complain about building non-source files while
building binary packages.
> Finally to the OP: BTW, you have to cut out the brain of upstream
> and include a digitized version of it in your source, becasue that one
> is the preferred version of editing, and the real source.
>
> Guys you are getting ridicuolous.
Actually, your posting is perhaps the only one that meets this
criteria. What is so wrong about insisting on the preferred form of
modification?
manoj
--
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you
do it. Gandhi
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
