Le dimanche 09 août 2009 22:40:30, Matthew Johnson a écrit : > Hi Damien,
Hi Matthew, > I've reviewed the package and it looks clean, but I have one question. > Which bit is licenced under the apache-derived licence? I can only find > BSD-licenced files. OpenSymfony Licence (Apache derived one) is promoted by upstream as official OGNL project licence [1]. But, as you, every source file I can found under src/ in tarball were licenced under classical BSD licence. IMHO, this OpenSymfony Licence apply, at least, to DocBook sources files in docbook/. All in all, thoses licences seems compatible between each other so it doesn't hurt. [1] http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/license.action -- Damien Raude-Morvan / www.drazzib.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
