Hi Ben! Thank you for your input.
When I posted the current synopsis I decided to re-use the (short-) descriptions that the upstream project uses itself. So that they look similar. But I can re-submit this RFS, of course, to make things clearer. /Federico Hernandez On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au<ben%2bdeb...@benfinney.id.au> > wrote: > Federico Hernandez <ultrafre...@gmail.com> writes: > > > It builds these binary packages: > > taskwarrior - An open source, command-line, TODO list manager > > Please give the full package description in your RFP, so prospective > sponsors have more of a guide to know whether the package is of interest > to them. > > As for this synopsis: The synopsis is best if it uses the limited space > to help the readner make a decision about whether this package will meet > their needs (at least enough to look further). > > All packages in Debian are free software (unless they are buggy), so > “An open source” is not helpful. > > The term “TODO” isn't an initialism for anything, so it shouldn't be > capital-letters in a sentence like this. > > So the synopsis could better read: > > command-line to do list manager > > Is there anything else which the reader might like to see in the > synopsis? Perhaps when we see the full description we can write a better > synopsis. > > -- > \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, | > `\ Brain, but if they called them ‘Sad Meals’, kids wouldn't buy | > _o__) them!” —_Pinky and The Brain_ | > Ben Finney > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > >
